Members List
Who's Online

Welcome Guest to The Blue Lodge an on-line community for Freemasons and interested non-Freemasons.

The Blue Lodge is a community portal for discussing the ancient art of Freemasonry and it's future. If you are a Antient or Moderns Freemason, Knights Templar, Scottish Rite, York Rite, Shriner, Eastern Star, Prince Hall Mason or just read Dan Brown's book "The Da Vinci Code" and want to learn more about the "true" art of Freemasonry, then this is the right place for you.

You are currently viewing our community portal as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By registering as a member you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own photos and access many other special features.


Click Here to Register for your FREE Account!

Go Back   The Blue Lodge > Blue Lodge Forums > Modern Freemasonry Discussions


  No Account? Register Now!
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes

Re: Antient and Moderns Comparison
Old 12-17-2007, 10:46 AM   #11
jbarr
Junior Member
 
jbarr is Offline
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 14
Rep: jbarr is on a distinguished road
Rep Power: 0
Re: Antient and Moderns Comparison

Regarding South Carolina's use of AFM, I saw this the other day (Forgot the site)...

-----
Why is SC Grand Lodge AFM?

Most grand lodges are styled F&AM (Free & Accepted Masons) or AF&AM ( Ancient Free & Accepted Masons). So why is South Carolina the only grand lodge called Ancient Free Masons (AFM)?

Before December 26, 1818, there where two grand lodges in South Carolina - the Grand Lodge of Ancient York Masons and the Grand Lodge of Free and Accepted Masons of South Carolina (Modern Masons). They took the name Grand Lodge of Ancient Free Masons of South Carolina as one of the compromises made to merge the two bodies.

-- Masonic Light
April 1995
__________________
-Jim
MasonicTips.com
  Reply With Quote

Re: Antient and Moderns Comparison
Old 12-17-2007, 11:08 AM   #12
grandsecretary
Senior Member
 
grandsecretary's Avatar
 
grandsecretary is Offline
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: York, England
Posts: 124
Rep: grandsecretary will become famous soon enough
Rep Power: 2
Send a message via Skype™ to grandsecretary
Re: Antient and Moderns Comparison

You know, the history of Freemasonry in England is clearly set out and very carefully sourced on our website www.grandlodgeofallengland.org

To continue to suggest, despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary, that The Grand Lodge of London (now known as The United Grand Lodge of England) was the first Grand Lodge in England is not acceptable to the thinking Mason.

The days are gone where the simple repetition of an obvious and tiresome calumny which denies the history of England itself, will be believed and it does no credit to those who continually repeat it in the hope that it will be believed.

If any brother wishes to know what happened in England from Anglo-Saxon times to today then the Webpage: Grand Lodges in England is available to him.

This is just one, but a typical quoted and documented source:

"Edward was succeeded, in 924, by his son, Athelstan, whose brother, Edwin, procured from the king a charter for masons, by which they were empowered to meet annually in a general assembly, and to have power to regulate their own order. And, according to this charter, the first grand lodge of England met at York, in 926. But here it is to be remarked that the grand lodge is not to be understood as the same in those times that it is now; it was not then restricted to the masters and wardens of private lodges, but was open to as many of the fraternity as could attend: for, until late years, the grand lodge as now constituted did not exist, but there was but one family of masons; and any sufficient number of masons met together, with the consent of the civil magistrate, to practice the rites of masonry, without warrant of constitution as a lodge.

"On the death of Prince Edwin, Athelstan himself presided over the lodges; but after his decease, we know little of the state of the masons in Britain, except that they were governed by Dunstan, Archbishop of Canterbury, in 960, and Edward the Confessor in 1041. But in 1066, William the Conqueror appointed Gondulph, Bishop of Rochester, to preside over the society. In 1100, Henry the First patronised them; and in 1135, during the reign of Stephen, the society was under the command of Gilbert de Clare, Marquess of Pembroke."

(SOURCE: The Freemasons' Pocket Companion - Apollo Lodge, Oxford University, Jurisdiction of the United Grand Lodge of England, independently reported by The Mirror of Literature, Amusement and Instruction, Vol. 17, Issue 491, May 28 1831).
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:24 PM.
  

vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright TheBlueLodge.org 2006

Site Map (Not Shown on Registered Members Pages)
MN 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
AF - 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113
ST - 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6,