Joe,
You asked:
Quote:
|
But you think the arguing is bad, is this correct?
|
I don't think an argument is bad, if it is a civil discourse about a subject where two or more parties have differing opinions. In a debate, each side presents its "argument". What I object to is insults and personal attacks that do nothing to further one's case or bring about understanding and/or compromise.
Much of the "discussion" about the so-called
Modern vs
Antient debate seems to take the form of "my side good, your side bad". That gets us nowhere.
I believe it is possible to have differences, even apparent conflicts that are settled amicably. For example, consider the UGLE's position on Co-Masonry and Female Only Masonry:
This is the official line taken by United Grand Lodge of England on the question of Women Freemasons
Quote:
Statement issued by UGLE - 10th March 1999
There exist in England and Wales at least two Grand Lodges solely for women. Except that these bodies admit women, they are, so far as can be ascertained, otherwise regular in their practice. There is also one which admits both men and women to membership. They are not recognised by this Grand Lodge and intervisitation may not take place. There are, however, discussions from time to time with the women's Grand Lodges on matters of mutual concern. Brethren are therefore free to explain to non-Masons, if asked, that Freemasonry is not confined to men(even though this Grand Lodge does not itself admit women). Further information about these bodies may be obtained by writing to the Grand Secretary.
The Board is also aware that there exist other bodies not directly imitative of pure antient Masonry, but which by implication introduce Freemasonry, such as the Order of the Eastern Star. Membership of such bodies, attendance at their meetings, or participation in their ceremonies is incompatible with membership of this Grand Lodge.
|
You will notice that the subject of "Regularity" and "Recognition" are kept separate in this statement. Wouldn't be more appropriate if those discussions about the differing Masonic bodies, especially here in the USA, were approached in the same manner?
Quote:
|
Mr. George do you prefer the Moderns or Ancients? It seems everyone has a very strong opinion about this.
|
I prefer men and women who claim to embrace the Masonic Philosophy who act accordingly when dealing with any other human being, but more especially with someone who also claims and demonstrates that they are also a Mason.
I wish I knew. I just know that it is seldom a title that is used as a compliment!